🔗 Share this article

It is a glowing feature in a magazine that the president has consistently praised – but for one catch. The front-page image, he stated, ""might be the most terrible in history".

Time magazine's tribute to Trump's role in mediating a ceasefire in Gaza, featured on its November 10 cover, was accompanied by a photo of Trump captured from underneath and with the sun behind his head.

The effect, Trump claims, is "super bad".

"Time wrote a relatively good story about me, but the picture may be the lowest quality in history", he shared on his social media platform.

“They removed my hair, and then had a shape drifting on top of my head that resembled a floating crown, but an remarkably little one. Truly strange! I never liked taking pictures from underneath angles, but this is a super bad picture, and merits public condemnation. What are they doing, and why?”

The president has expressed clear his wish to appear on the cover of Time and achieved this on four occasions in the previous year. This fixation has extended to the president's resorts – years ago, the editors demanded to remove fabricated front pages shown in a few of his establishments.

The latest edition’s photo was taken by Graeme Sloane for Bloomberg at the White House on the fifth of October.

Its angle did no favours for his chin and neck area – an opening that the governor of California Newsom took advantage of, with his communications team sharing an altered image with the problematic part blurred.

{The living Israeli hostages detained in Gaza have been released under the first phase of Donald Trump's peace plan, in exchange for a freeing of Palestinian inmates. This agreement might turn into a major success of Trump's second term, and it could mark a strategic turning point for that part of the world.

Simultaneously, a defence of the president’s appearance has come from a surprising origin: the director of information at Moscow's diplomatic office stepped in to criticise the "damaging" picture decision.

It's remarkable: a photo exposes those who chose it than about the person in it. Only sick people, people filled with spite and animosity –maybe even degenerates – could have selected such an image", the official shared on Telegram.

Considering the favorable images of President Biden that the periodical featured on the front, even with his age-related challenges, the situation is self-revealing for the magazine", she said.

The answer to his queries – what did the editors intend, and why? – could be related to creatively capturing a feeling of authority says an imaging expert, Guardian Australia’s picture editor.

The image itself technically is good," she notes. "They picked this image because they wanted trump to look heroic. Gazing upward creates an impression of their majesty and his expression actually looks contemplative and almost somewhat divine. It’s not often you see pictures of him in such a serene moment – the picture feels tender."

The president's hair looks erased because the sunlight behind him has bleached that section of the image, producing a glowing aura, she says. Even though the article's title complements his facial expression in the image, "one cannot constantly gratify the subject matter."

"No one likes being photographed from below, and while all of the conceptual elements of the image are very strong, the visual appeal are unflattering."

The publication approached the magazine for a statement.